Hi Norman, purely from a layman's perspective our creator, created a world that turns and by that very nature down to the smallest of things that has energy and moves, everything is in constant state of change, so balance and equilibrium only comes into play when nothing external is acting on the equilibrium in question, like a plant growing needs sunlight, water and nutrients from the ground in the right quantities for perfect growth, but this same plant is affected by weather and many other factors, so that 50/50 balance is not quite achievable unless under strict conditions and the 80/20 principle is not achievable either because outside conditions vary, the plant is constantly changing to adapt to it surrounding to survive.
Take yourself, you could be near to a state of balance with no money worries, happy family and joyfulness counter balancing many of the financial tax burdens and stress put upon form outside forces, but this near state of balance could change in an instant, an illness, an accident then the balance becomes unstable and the percentage all depends on how severe it is, In this situation you are but one in 8 billion and of that percentage this accident or illness could be any percentage in a changing world.
Balance of forces in physics, if everything was balanced then there would be no change is this the case ? everything has shape, angles which have mathematical calculations put on it, but is this the logical language of creation, is creation the constantly changing percentages that give us the variation and complexity to life. Did our creators energy always have numbers attached or is that the attachment our minds use to find our creator.
Please tell me if I'm completely off track here, in laymen's term please
Thank you for this Norman, conserving energy comes to mind, using the least amount of energy to get the desired effect, the same with language using many of the smaller words to convey the story, also like a rat using the easiest route to get its food.
I am writing about what I call the US family, (also songs as well) words ending with us, like ambiguous, boisterous, contentious and many others, trying to put them into character form so that youngsters can have a wider vocabulary, something that I was never good with in school, this will go against the Pareto principle of 80/20 if I can achieve this, principles are only there if we allow them to be, if you can change the perspective and realise what happens when convienence lessons the ability.
Hi Norman, purely from a layman's perspective our creator, created a world that turns and by that very nature down to the smallest of things that has energy and moves, everything is in constant state of change, so balance and equilibrium only comes into play when nothing external is acting on the equilibrium in question, like a plant growing needs sunlight, water and nutrients from the ground in the right quantities for perfect growth, but this same plant is affected by weather and many other factors, so that 50/50 balance is not quite achievable unless under strict conditions and the 80/20 principle is not achievable either because outside conditions vary, the plant is constantly changing to adapt to it surrounding to survive.
Take yourself, you could be near to a state of balance with no money worries, happy family and joyfulness counter balancing many of the financial tax burdens and stress put upon form outside forces, but this near state of balance could change in an instant, an illness, an accident then the balance becomes unstable and the percentage all depends on how severe it is, In this situation you are but one in 8 billion and of that percentage this accident or illness could be any percentage in a changing world.
Balance of forces in physics, if everything was balanced then there would be no change is this the case ? everything has shape, angles which have mathematical calculations put on it, but is this the logical language of creation, is creation the constantly changing percentages that give us the variation and complexity to life. Did our creators energy always have numbers attached or is that the attachment our minds use to find our creator.
Please tell me if I'm completely off track here, in laymen's term please
Hello Dallas Everything you have talked about comes from 80/20 and the pareto priciple have you watched th these videos https://normanjames.substack.com/p/fundamental-perspective?utm_source=publication-search. https://normanjames.substack.com/p/the-cosmic-dance-of-gender-exploring?utm_source=publication-search maybe these could expand your perspective
Thank you for this Norman, conserving energy comes to mind, using the least amount of energy to get the desired effect, the same with language using many of the smaller words to convey the story, also like a rat using the easiest route to get its food.
I am writing about what I call the US family, (also songs as well) words ending with us, like ambiguous, boisterous, contentious and many others, trying to put them into character form so that youngsters can have a wider vocabulary, something that I was never good with in school, this will go against the Pareto principle of 80/20 if I can achieve this, principles are only there if we allow them to be, if you can change the perspective and realise what happens when convienence lessons the ability.
The lottery is a sham because the lucky dip doesnt follow this rule.
I WRITE A LOT ABOUT THIS PRINCIPLE THIS ONE IS IMPORTANT WITH INFORMATION ITS HOW I GET THROUGH THE BULLSHIT MATHEMATICALLY https://normanjames.substack.com/p/logic-wisdom-then-science-to-confirm
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/the-cosmic-dance-of-gender-exploring?utm_source=publication-search
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/the-dark-side-of-the-pareto-principle?utm_source=publication-search
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/pareto-principle-analogy?utm_source=publication-search
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/navigating-truth-in-a-world-shaped?utm_source=publication-search
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/the-chicken-or-the-egg-paradox-and?utm_source=publication-search
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/the-fractal-nature-of-pareto-wisdom?utm_source=publication-search
80 percent of 8 billion are not good odds.
https://normanjames.substack.com/p/fundamental-perspective?utm_source=publication-search watch the video of EM-1. it's 80 NPC 10% bad and 10% good the 80% sways with the sides that is winning